What´s Behind Treatment?
|
||
|
If we were to ask ourselves “What is the essence of Shiatsu?“ we would surely come up with a variety of answers, but the word “essence” suggests that we must look deeply, penetrate to the core of the subject. Essence, in Chinese Medicine also has its particular significance. It is thought of as the primordial substance, the yin aspect of Qi, by which living things grow and develop; that is the material basis on which something is built. But Yin-yang law tells us that we should be careful because if we look too deeply, what we are looking at will disappear or become its opposite. In any case our perspective will determine the result, so we must be aware of our intentions, our position and point of view as well. I might begin by saying that that the essence of shiatsu is treatment, and the essence of this treatment is touch. But we touch in many ways, so what is the essence of this touch? Shiatsu says this is finger pressure; Masunaga said this is a stationary, perpendicular, penetrating pressure that contacts our Ki and is based in Hara. But what is Ki, and what is Hara? We will need to look out as well as in to make any sense of this at all. We need to see the context. For this reason I want to examine context, not as a means of clarifying the “Essence” that according to TCM forms human beings, but the essence of Shiatsu itself and what makes it useful in the world. Shiatsu emerged in the context of traditional medicine in Japan in an effort to define related treatment aims more closely and to avoid the somewhat degraded popular uses and attitudes accorded to Anma, the established form of massage. Yet, in its short trajectory through the second half of the twentieth century and its spread through the Western world, the reputation and uses of Shiatsu have also become so widely dispersed that, arguably, it could be in a similar position to that of Anma a century before. (A corresponding dilemma has existed in relation to massage in many societies). Those of us who wish to preserve its status as a respected therapeutic modality need to question our own perception and understanding of what it is we do, or want to do, under this simple banner; where Shiatsu fits in the broader tradition of Oriental Medicine and Healing, and whether we can then clarify what is on offer, both to the public and to colleagues in related fields. We need to grapple a bit with the terms and conditions of the "New Age", "Alternative" and "complementary" bandwagons to determine our position in the mainstream. Shiatsu is a treatment that uses a wide range of techniques, any of which may be adapted to a variety of ends. So it is used for relaxation and pleasure, to generally ease pain, tension and tiredness and it may be offered by call-girls or rent-boys, as a pretext or as part of their service. It can be taught at an amateur level for people to use at home, treating their children and sharing with loved ones; equally it could form part of a beautician training and be given as part of any salon treatment programme or on visiting a good hairdresser; likewise with professional training it may be offered with various degrees of specialism in bona fide health centres, hospitals and clinics as a tried and tested medical therapy. What is it then that makes the difference? It is not only a question of the refined physical skills and manual dexterity that we develop through training and practice, though these are important. It is as much a question of personal intent that leads us on with more or less integrity. Plainly, the degree to which we are prepared to study the related Oriental and modern traditions of medicine and healing, and integrate that knowledge with our acquired technical skills, will determine our fitness to practise the art in the context of our choosing, if medicine it is. By this I want to say two things. Firstly that I think it important that Shiatsu Therapy (originally Shiatsu Ryoho) is seen and taught with the widest possible references, both to the Japanese and Chinese medical healing tradition from which it grew and to the contemporary range of clinical applications in which it can be applied. Secondly, I do not think that to focus on any narrow or single track training, even a specialism in shiatsu alone, let alone any of the many "styles" or types of shiatsu that have emerged, serves us very well as a profession. We would do better to maintain our shiatsu along with all its associated therapeutic techniques within the nourishing stream of the whole tradition, and to develop it respectfully in that context. If anything, Shiatsu itself is already too isolated from its roots and we should be all the more wary of the contemporary trend to develop and market new, improved and individual styles or methods of treatment, a trend that has generally resulted in a proliferation of bodywork and other therapists whose walls are covered with minor certificates but whose work lacks depth, range and continuity. Now it is clearer that "context" as an aspect of what we do will always merit attention. If more consideration were given to the context in which it was intended that our work be focussed, and the reasons for aspiring to such work were brought out and aired, then decisions would be easier. Some people could avoid unnecessary stress and expense, choosing a more modest goal, and others might be encouraged to find the motivation and confidence necessary to pursue a longer and more demanding training. If we wish to understand and to justify the application of shiatsu techniques for the many and varied purposes listed above, we have only to recognise the different circumstantial needs that exist. Then we should make our own intentions plain and prepare ourselves well enough for our abilities and intentions to be recognised. We should also consider the context of the treatment itself - an understanding, or a contract if you like, between two parties. The expectations of the client will have much to do with the nature of the offer. If this is not explicit then the client, or patient, will be left to imagine the limits and make the best use of it they can. But there must be some correspondence with the client's needs for the process to have any validity. If we advertise our shiatsu in a way that suggests particular therapeutic benefits then we should be able to answer to those needs and prepared for an ongoing, reflective and negotiable process. If we say there is an educational element to our work, then that permits another type of exchange that will be expected to move the client's position to new skills and confidence over time. The more we couch our work in a medical context, the more we invite our patients to trust us with medical problems and the more it is our responsibility to deal with those problems as a priority. We may introduce deeper, therapeutic or educational elements later, if this is appropriate and agreed. If we explicitly recognise the possibilities and limits of amateur or “home treatment” we can also develop this important aspect of the Shiatsu tradition. We may want to develop shiatsu as a bodywork therapy that releases energy blocked through psychic or emotional suppression and helps people to access and integrate their feelings, but we would still need the experience of substantial training in both Oriental and Western disciplines to be able to authentically offer that in the public domain. If we see shiatsu above all as a most accessible form of relaxing, energy based "massage", of general benefit to everybody, we can do a basic training and take our work where we like. In all the senses so far discussed, we could see “context” as providing, or at least strongly implying, one half of the guarantee, as it were; the substance or essence of our skill obviously forms the other half. But beyond this there is one last important contextual consideration, the internal condition of the client. The background givens of a person are so pervasive, yet their dimensions so intangible, that we might just miss the grand implication, even while we conscientiously pursue the diagnostic threads that lead to a more efficacious outcome. It is this: that in fact the receiver's mind-body state will most determine the results of treatment. So strong are the natural self-healing forces, for one part, and sub-conscious regulating or inhibiting factors for another, that the treatment we give has less to do with the outcomes than we might think, or want to think from our ego's point of view, though we address ourselves to the client in the most perceptive, holistic way. Even routine treatment will bring to a hundred different people, a hundred possibly quite different benefits over a range from insignificant to near miraculous. This could be a discouraging realisation and we could ask ourselves, “why study diagnosis and specific therapeutic strategies at all?”. The answer of course is that we should study and practise all the more to make what extra difference we can; and further, highly trained or not, we will always be of more use to others when we proceed in a humble spirit and respect their integrity. So, what could our reasons be for studying Shiatsu, essentially? When all is said and done, Shiatsu remains a Japanese word and that suggests a Japanese basis. Without that we are in a different frame completely. Perhaps, then, it is important for us to ask why we need the Oriental model. Plenty that is good and valid can be found in our own or in other non-oriental cultures. What does Shiatsu imply that is of such essential value that we cannot ignore it, bear to pass it over or expect to find its equivalent elsewhere? For me there are three parts to the answer. A summary of the “contextual essence” of Shiatsu
|
|
|
© Paul Lundberg began his studies of Shiatsu in 1974, and of Acupuncture in the following year, graduating from The International College of Oriental Medicine in 1978. His interest in Taiji and Qigong dates from this same period. During more than twenty five years of practising and teaching these subjects he has studied continually both Chinese and Japanese healing systems and related contemporary Western psycho-physical dynamic therapies, working with many internationally respected masters. In particular, he has long been associated as a student and collaborator with Akinobu Kishi. Since 1981, when he first went to Japan to study Shinto healing and Seiki with Kishi, he has been concerned with integrating the vision and practice of Seiki into his own work. Co-founder of The Shiatsu College, UK (London, 1986), he later established a branch of the College in Brighton of which he was the director for five years. He is the author of The Book of Shiatsu (I992/2003), now published in twelve languages. He currently lives most of the year in Tenerife where he spends much of his time writing. He continues to teach courses and seminars in the UK., Spain and other European countries. |